Jail-Based Medication-Assisted Treatment:
ESSENTIAL PROGRAM COMPONENTS
Fred Meyer, MA, CJM, CCHP Claire Wolfe, MPH, MA, CCHP Jim Voisard, CCHP-A
The first article in this series focused on the essential role of custody staff to a successful medication-assisted treatment (MAT) program; here, we expand the view to include facility leadership and health staff, while maintaining that custody staff are integral to the MAT program. Guided by the 2018 NCCHC Standards for Health Services in Jails and the 2016 Standards for Opioid Treatment Programs in Correctional Facilities, below are the essential (though not exhaustive) components to planning, implementing, and maintaining a jail-based MAT program.
Program Component 1: Leadership and Staff Buy-In
The first essential component of a MAT program is buy-in from both leadership and facility, medical, and custody staff. The program will not be successful without support and funding from leadership or the commitment of day-to-day facility staff who are on the front lines ensuring that the program is well-run, medication is administered in a timely and appropriate way, and efforts to minimize medication diversion and misuse are consistent. As we mentioned in Part I, individuals with opioid use disorder are disproportionately represented in U.S. jails and prisons relative to the general population. Given that our facilities are on the front lines of the opioid epidemic, it makes sense that we have full access to all the tools available to help resolve this public health crisis. MAT is one of these tools and can lead to safer and healthier individuals and communities.
Prior to implementing a MAT program, a team should be assembled that includes medical and custody staff and facility leadership. Funding can be procured through various means, including legislation and state budget advocacy, government or private grants, and settlement funds resulting from legal action against pharmaceutical companies, funding must be pursued aggressively in the long term to ensure program sustainability. It is important to assess the resources available to the facility, including access to licensed providers who have the clinical expertise to run such a program, and the goals of the program, including how long treatment will be offered if continuing medication for those on medication in the community and whether the program will include medication induction for those who are screened and subsequently assessed to have an opioid use disorder (OUD) but who are not on medication in the community. Through independent research and conversations with agency representatives during planning, ensure that all applicable federal and state laws and regulations are followed.
Program Component 2: Community Partnerships
Medication-assisted treatment includes the use of Federal Drug Administration-approved medications methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Any licensed provider can prescribe naltrexone, and, in December 2022, President Biden signed the Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act, which removes current restrictions around who can prescribe buprenorphine. Methadone, however, is subject to strict federal regulations and can only be dispensed by a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)-certified opioid treatment program (OTP).
Jails can become certified OTPs through the certification and accreditation process. However, if methadone is a part of your planned MAT program and your facility lacks the resources to move through that process, a partnership with a community-based OTP may be a good option. Before engaging in a partnership, it’s important to have a clear understanding of your goals and resources. For example, correctional facilities may transport patients to the OTP daily for methadone dosing. Alternatively, some facilities may be able to transport the medication from the OTP to patients at the facility. At the end of the day, community-based OTPs are partners and may have preferences or conditions regarding how a MAT program is run and what services are provided, governed by philosophical beliefs around treatment, as well as state and federal regulations.
Program Component 3: Policies and Procedures
NCCHC Standards require that each standard is addressed by a policy and procedure. These documents may be drafted in-house or written by an outside organization with experience in correctional health care and should be structured based on national standards and treatment protocols. When aligning policies with NCCHC Standards, focus on the intent of each standard. Identify site-specific procedures that address all operational steps that will be used to meet the intent of each policy. Questions that should be answered in your program policies and procedures include, but are not limited to:
• What is the process for screening individuals for substance use disorders upon intake?
• Are educational resources on the risk and benefits of MAT available?
• What consent documents will individuals be required to sign to enroll?
• Which of the three medications will be offered?
• What is the protocol for medically managed withdrawal?
• How will the facility continue medication for those already enrolled in a community-based program or receiving medication from a provider in the community?
• Will medication be continued throughout incarceration?
• Will the facility begin medication for those assessed to have an opioid use disorder but who are not receiving medication in the community?
• What is the protocol for pregnant individuals?
• What counseling services will be provided?
• What processes are planned or in place to ensure continuity of care upon release (i.e., discharge planning)?
When in doubt, technical assistance is available from national organizations. Alternatively, approaching accredited jail-based agencies with established MAT programs to seek advice and inquire if they are willing to share their program policies and procedures is recommended.
Program Component 4: Education and Training
You need only look around the room where you are reading this, whether it is your place of work, in the waiting room for an appointment, or, for many, your own home, to find someone who has been touched, directly or indirectly, by the opioid epidemic in this country. Yet, stigma surrounding those with an opioid use disorder and those in the criminal justice system is immense and can act a barrier to care.
Negative attitudes about MAT and justice-involved individuals, the misconception that the use of medication to treat OUD is “trading one drug for another,” fear of medication diversion and misuse, and a generally punitive versus rehabilitative environment have been well-documented as barriers to MAT programs in correctional settings. However, research has demonstrated that the belief that there is a genetic and/or biological basis for OUD, relative to the belief that the disorder is a result of moral failings, is associated with a more positive attitude towards MAT (Moore et al., 2022).
This is where education is essential. It is crucial that experts are engaged to provide facility staff with information about the causes of opioid use disorder, the impact of opioid use on the brain, evidence of the effectiveness of MAT, and how social and economic circumstances and mental health issues can lead to adverse health outcomes, drug use, and involvement in the criminal justice system and also influence recovery.
After the policies and procedures are reviewed and approved by the appropriate individuals, both health and custody staff will need to receive training on the content. This can be conducted internally or concurrently with a larger educational session about OUD and MAT from outside experts. Interactive learning with multiple teaching methods (e.g., open discussion, lecture, and role playing) will enhance content retention and audience attention. Participants should take a pre- and post-training quiz to measure the effectiveness of the session and evaluate the need for further training.
Program Component 5: Implementation
Once the program processes have been determined, resources designated, and custody and medical staff trained on medication-assisted treatment, the real work begins. Historically, detention and correctional facilities have been somewhat isolated and resistant to change. As operations have evolved to direct management of inmates, the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities of correctional staff increased dramatically. Today’s jail professionals are required to wear many hats, none more important than ensuring the life and safety of everyone they work with and those they are required to supervise.
There will initially be some staff resistance to a MAT program, as it’s different from what has always been done. There is a security risk associated with all medications in a jail environment, and this new process will potentially introduce additional opportunities for contraband. With proper custody and health staff training and effective policies and supervision, however, those risks are mitigated. The sanctity of life is an important concept, and effective MAT programs reduce the frequency of detoxification-related crises.
For medical personnel, strategies to minimize medication misuse and diversion include ensuring adequate staffing-to-patient ratios to allow for the appropriate time for and supervision of medication administration; continuous communication and regular meetings between all individuals who are involved in the program, including between custody and health staff; and randomized drug testing processes. MAT programs should be evaluated through continuous quality improvement (CQI) studies. Focus should be given to metrics that have most value for key stakeholders and may include collecting data about processes to understand how well the program is being delivered and/or outcome data that will provide information about the impact of the program.
Custody staff, supervision, and administration are key to the safe, secure, and effective implementation of any MAT program. Officers escorting nurses must ensure the medication provided is ingested and not misdirected or secreted in some way. This is especially important when methadone is being administered by a nurse in an opioid treatment program regimen. The officer and nurse must both be vigilant to ensure the medication is ingested properly. Safety and security-minded teamwork is critical to success and needs to be the focus every single time, with every individual receiving medication. Security over convenience, always.
Supervisors and effective policies are crucial to ensure safety, security, and accountability. First-line supervisors need to be engaged with the operations of their assigned areas. Audits of medication pass procedures should be conducted frequently and unannounced, to ensure both nursing and custody staff are working in a safe and effective way. The more face time supervisors have with officers and health staff, the more communication will improve and the more effective the program will be.
Managers and administrators need to remember to inspect what they expect. While schedules are always busy, we can find the time to “manage by walking around” more than we currently do. The relationships forged with community members and service providers, politicians, and funding bodies will grow and flourish when we are engaged and can speak about the operation effectively. Especially during the first several months, your engagement and commitment to this process will pay out. Fewer detoxification incidents and potentially fewer in-custody deaths are valuable goals for any leader. Let’s not forget that fewer incidents will also reduce stress for our staff and provide a safer environment for everyone.
Program Component 6: Discharge Planning
It is common to hear that “discharge planning begins at intake” when it comes to health care in a jail-based setting, given the transient nature and often short length of stay in the facility. This must be practiced diligently when it comes to releasing an individual in a MAT program into the community. Research has repeatedly shown that individuals who receive MAT during incarceration have better health outcomes upon release, including longer retention in community-based treatment, reduced recidivism, lower risk of overdose, and even lower all-cause mortality, relative to those who initiate treatment post-release or who receive no medication treatment (Brinkley-Rubenstein et al., 2019; Marsden et al., 2017; Moore et al., 2019; Rich et al., 2015; Evans et al., 2022).
Upon release, an individual should be given either a bridge dose of medication (as appropriate) or a prescription to continue their medication sent to a local pharmacy. At the very least, individuals should have a follow-up appointment scheduled in the community with an OTP or provider. To facilitate continuity of care, facilities should also try to ensure that individuals have access to health insurance or have their Medicaid re-instated upon release. A formal or informal partnership with a local OTP or community-based provider that works with formerly incarcerated individuals can be an excellent tool in promoting continuity of care and providing a warm handoff during a precarious time for patients.
Although largely out of control of jails, it is important to acknowledge the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) or the non-medical factors that influence health outcomes, including economic stability, education access and quality, health care access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, and social and community context (“Social Determinants of Health,” n.d.). When considering long-term healing and abstinence from illicit opioids, as well as reducing recidivism, these factors are an important piece of the conversation.
NCCHC Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) Accreditation
Under federal law, correctional facilities looking to become a corrections-based OTP must first be accredited by a federally approved body, such as NCCHC, which has been granted accrediting authority by SAMHSA. Then, it must obtain certification from SAMHSA. The NCCHC Standards for Opioid Treatment Programs in Correctional Facilities are the foundation of OTP accreditation and the best place to begin when seeking to become a federally certified corrections-based OTP.
When preparing for accreditation, common challenges that may occur and should be proactively addressed include:
• Ineffective coordination/collaboration among correctional, health care services vendor, and/or community-based partners
• Difficulty navigating federal and state regulatory requirements
• A less than full comprehension and understanding of accreditation standards
• Insufficient documentation to support consistent compliance with accreditation standards
• Ensuring that the MAT program is an integral part of administrative/staff meetings, CQI, health record reviews, and training
It is best to apply for accreditation with at least nine months of program treatment history to show consistent compliance with the Standards. Further, it may be helpful to conduct a mock pre-accreditation review based on the standards.
Although a jail-based MAT program is a big undertaking, the work that you are doing to help an extremely vulnerable population is commendable and will make a difference in our society. It will take years-long dedication from private organizations, nonprofits, and
government entities to end the opioid epidemic, but a well-run MAT program will contribute to that goal. We thank you for all that you do in keeping our communities safe and those in your care healthy. Please look out for the third article in this series, where we will look more in-depth at how to implement a successful MAT program.
____________________________________
Fred W. Meyer, MA CJM, CCHP, is managing director of NCCHC Resources, Inc., the consulting arm of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care. A retired deputy chief, he has more than 25 years of experience in corrections and is a graduate of the National Jail Leadership Command Academy and Jail Executive Development Program. He holds a master’s degree in Criminal Justice from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. He can be reached atfredmeyer@ncchcresources.org
Claire Wolfe, MPH, MA, CCHP, is a program manager at NCCHC Resources, Inc. She holds a Master of Public Health in Epidemiology and has focused her research on opioid use disorder treatment in jails. Previously, she worked for the philanthropic arm of a multi-national IT consulting company and as the chief of staff for a New Jersey State Assemblyman. She can be reached atclairewolfe@ncchcresources.org.
Jim Voisard, CCHP-A, is a senior lead surveyor with the National Commission on Correctional Health Care and a consultant with NCCHC Resources, Inc., the organization’s consulting subsidiary. His four decades of correctional health care experience include overseeing health care within juvenile detention, jail, and prison facilities. He is a member of the NCCHC OTP standards revision task force, surveyor advisory committee, and accreditation committee. He can be reached at jimvoisard@ncchcresources.org.
References
Brinkley-Rubinstein, L., Peterson, M., Clarke, J., Macmadu, A., Truong, A., Pognon, K., Rich, J. D. (2019). The benefits and implementation challenges of the first state-wide comprehensive medication for addictions program in a unified jail and prison setting. Drug Alcohol Depend, 205, 107514. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2019.06.016
Degenhardt, L., Larney, S., Kimber, J., Gisev, N., Farrell, M., Dobbins, T., Weatherburn, D. J., Gibson, A., Mattick, R., Butler, T., & Burns, L. (2014). The impact of opioid substitution therapy on mortality post-release from prison: retrospective data linkage study. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 109(8), 1306–1317. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/add.12536
Evans, E. A., Wilson, D., & Friedmann, P. D. (2022). Recidivism and mortality after in-jail buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 231, 109254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109254
Marsden, J., Stillwell, G., Jones, H., Cooper, A., Eastwood, B., Farrell, M., Hickman, M. (2017). Does exposure to opioid substitution treatment in prison reduce the risk of death after release? A national prospective observational study in England. Addiction, 112(8), 1408-1418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13779
Moore, K. E., Roberts, W., Reid, H. H., Smith, K. M. Z., Oberleitner, L. M. S., & McKee, S. A. (2019). Effectiveness of medication assisted treatment for opioid use in prison and jail settings: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 99, 32-43. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2018.12.003
Moore, Kelly E., Siebert, Shania, L., Kromash, Rachelle, Owens, Mandy, D., Allen, Diamond, C. (2022) Negative attitudes about medications for opioid use disorder among criminal legal staff. Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports, 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.dadr.2022.100056
Rich, J. D., McKenzie, M., Larney, S., Wong, J. B., Tran, L., Clarke, J., Noska, A., Reddy, M., & Zaller, N. (2015). Methadone continuation versus forced withdrawal on incarceration in a combined US prison and jail: A randomised, open-label trial. The Lancet, 386(9991), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62338-2
Social Determinants of Health. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health