Getting Schooled
Heather Robinson
I hope everyone had a fun and informative time at the AJA Conference this year. I was fortunate enough to present "Getting Schooled: Successful SPED Programming in Corrections." I would like to go over some of the main points of the presentation for those who are interested but were unable to attend.
According to the 2022 National Center for Learning Disabilities report, nearly 3 out of every 4 incarcerated young people have been identified as having a learning disability (NCLD, 2022). Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) states that students with a documented disability, previous Individualized Education Program (IEP), or previous services related to a disability are to be provided, by the state, a free appropriate public education regardless of their incarceration status. Despite this, these eligible students are often overlooked and underserved, especially within correctional facilities (NCLD, 2023).
Providing special education (SPED) services to eligible students benefits not only students but communities and facilities as well. Students eligible for SPED services benefit from increased classroom and instructional time as well as increased educational support. These individuals often qualify for GED testing accommodations, which increases the likelihood of successfully completing high school alternative programs, if that is the academic path that is selected. Failure to provide SPED services limits students’ opportunities for success and has also resulted in numerous lawsuits and cost facilities millions of dollars in settlements (Lee, 2024).
Offering in-house educational services, particularly SPED services, does not come without certain challenges. I would like to briefly discuss the most common challenges a facility may incur while developing and implementing their own SPED program and ways to overcome them.
Working with Local School Districts
Determining who is eligible for services can be difficult. Ideally, school districts would know where every student is at every moment of their enrollment. However, that is not a reasonable expectation. To coordinate services, Douglas County Department of Corrections (DCDC) sends a weekly updated census list of all individuals 22 years of age and under housed within DCDC to our point of contact at the three most popular school districts within our area. From there the school districts review the list and identify every individual that is eligible to receive SPED services. The school districts can then coordinate services with DCDC. In addition to sending out a weekly census, DCDC quarterly uses the aforementioned census and locates each individual to ask:
- if they have graduated or earned their GED,
- whether they had an IEP at any point, and
- which schools they previously attended.
If an individual indicates that they received services from a different school district, DCDC informs the school district that one of their students is in our custody and works with that district to have services provided to their student.
Another challenge you may run into is identifying the party responsible for providing the SPED services. Determining the school district of residency is largely dependent upon individual state laws. In Nebraska for example, the school district of residency is the last school district in which the student was officially enrolled, regardless of their lack of attendance (Nebraska Department of Education, 2022, § 92-51). This is easy enough to ascertain through a simple conversation with your students. Child Find states that it is the responsibility of the school district to find and assess all students identified as possibly in need of services. Not every state requires that Child Find be applied to individuals that are incarcerated, though I would greatly suggest legislators reconsider that. It is important that your facility familiarize yourself with your particular state’s policy on Child Find within carceral settings.
To add to the challenge of successful implementation, sharing information between school districts can be vague and tedious. It is important for facilities to obtain copies of student’s IEPs in order to apply for testing accommodations. Even though parental involvement will be highly encouraged by the school districts for updating and implementing the IEPs, it is not required as part of the program. Once a student reaches the age of majority, they have the ability to request and release their own academic records (Nebraska Department of Education, 2022, § 92-51). This can be an important tool for ensuring that all students are receiving the services they are entitled to receive. Different states have different laws dictating what types of services incarcerated students are eligible for. Finally, there is ambiguity in what resources and services are protected under Part B of IDEA. Some states will require that eligible students be enrolled in regular credit accruing coursework concurrent with SPED services (California Education Code § 56041). Other states will not require school districts to offer credit accruing coursework. Instead, they will offer complimentary services to help eligible students progress through the selected high school equivalency program (Nebraska Department of Education, 2022, § 92-51).
Providing Accommodations
Special education services encompass more than extra homework assistance. These services can also include alternative methods of instruction, whether that may be having material read out loud, visual learning aids, and/or hands-on lesson plans. These methods of instruction should not be limited to your education department. In order to best serve the people in your facility, consideration should be given to implementing several methods of instruction across all classes and programming.
Special education services also include accommodations for those with a physical disability such as a visual or hearing impairment. You will in all likelihood, at some point, have an individual that is eligible for speech language therapy. A significant challenge exists with providing these services within your facility, especially with the coordination with the specific school district. Other ways SPED eligibility and services impact your facility are through testing accommodations for high school equivalency exams. For example, Pearson-Vue, the owners and administrators of the GED exam, offers accommodations such as extended testing time, a test reader, additional breaks, etc. that can be given assuming the appropriate supporting documentation is provided. This is critical for the academic success of many of your students. Finally, many of your eligible students may receive services for emotional disturbances.
Working in tandem with the local school districts to help address these concerns, as well as to give them the skills to successfully transition from your facility to the next location and ultimately back to the community, should be the ultimate goal of your program.
Conclusion
While working in the correctional field can be stressful and exhausting, we have a unique opportunity to positively impact the lives of many individuals and our community. Providing special education services increases the chances that your students successfully complete their educational program and learn skills that will better serve them in the future. Further, expanding SPED accommodations and strategies into other areas of your programming and facility can improve outcomes for your students both inside and outside the facility (NCLD, 2023).
I am enthusiastic about the possibilities and benefits of expanding SPED programming throughout correctional facilities. I hope that you also see the importance of offering these services to your eligible students as well. If you have any questions or would like to discuss creating more inclusive programming, please feel free to contact me. I would love to talk about this with you.
“In every challenge, a teacher finds an opportunity to inspire resilience.”
- Unknown
______________________________________________
Heather Robinson holds a master’s in psychology from the University of Iowa. She has worked for the Douglas County Department of Corrections in Omaha, Nebraska for the past ten years. She started her career as the education specialist at the work release and criminal justice center. She currently serves as the Educational and Vocational Supervisor. Heather has devoted a tremendous amount of time and energy to creating a more inclusive educational experience for the individuals in DCDC. You can contact her with any questions at heather.robinson@douglascounty-ne.gov
References
California Education Code, § 56041. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=EDC§ionNum=56041.5.
Lee, S. (2024, April 17). Lawsuit alleges incarcerated young adults are deprived of special education services. WBUR News. https://www.wbur.org/news/2024/04/17/dese-lawsuit-special-education-incarcerated-young-adults
NCLD report examines disproportionate involvement of youth with disabilities with the Juvenile Justice System. Council for Exceptional Children. (2022, December 9). https://exceptionalchildren.org/blog/ncld-report-examines-disproportionate-involvement-youth-disabilities-juvenile-justice-system
NCLD report examines disproportionate involvement of youth with disabilities with the Juvenile Justice System. Council for Exceptional Children. (2022, December 9). https://exceptionalchildren.org/blog/ncld-report-examines-disproportionate-involvement-youth-disabilities-juvenile-justice-system
Nebraska Department of Education, 2022, § 92-51. http://www.education.ne.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Clean51_2022.pdf