Supporting Successful Reintegration:
Rehabilitation and Reentry Programs in Local Jails
Mane Martirosyan, MSSW, CSW
As the criminal justice system continues to evolve, the role of rehabilitation and reentry programs in local jails is gaining attention. These programs address a crucial need: supporting individuals as they prepare to reintegrate into society. Unlike state or federal prisons, where incarcerated individuals typically serve longer sentences, local jails face the unique challenge of working with individuals who may only be detained for short periods or awaiting trial. This quick turnover presents unique obstacles but also offers opportunities to influence outcomes positively, reducing recidivism and fostering long-term community safety (James & Glaze, 2006).
Challenges of Rehabilitation in Local Jails
Local jails generally operate with fewer resources than larger correctional facilities, which can limit the scope of reentry and rehabilitation programs (Council of State Governments Justice Center, 2013). Additionally, the short-term nature of many jail stays—often a few days to several months—restricts opportunities for intensive rehabilitation work (Bales & Piquero, 2012). High turnover means individuals often cannot complete multi-phase programs, and continuity of care is frequently disrupted. Furthermore, individuals in jails often face more acute issues related to mental health, substance abuse, and unstable housing, which adds complexity to the rehabilitation process (Bronson & Berzofsky, 2017).
Rehabilitation and Skill-Building Programs
To address these challenges, some local jails are implementing targeted programs to make a difference within the limited time available. These programs include:
1. Substance Abuse Treatment and Counseling
Substance abuse is a leading cause of repeated jail visits. Many local jails are investing in substance abuse treatment, including detox programs, counseling, and peer support groups. Programs like Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder are particularly effective, helping individuals safely detox and prepare for community-based treatment upon release (Matusow et al., 2013).
2. Educational and Vocational Training
Education is one of the most effective tools for reducing recidivism. Even short-term access to GED classes, literacy programs, or basic job skills training can have a meaningful impact (Davis et al., 2013). Some jails are working with local community colleges and nonprofit organizations to offer courses that prepare individuals for entry-level jobs in fields like construction, food services, and warehousing.
3. Mental Health Services
Many incarcerated individuals suffer from untreated mental health issues, which can lead to repeated encounters with the criminal justice system. Local jails are increasingly providing mental health screenings and initiating treatment plans. These efforts may include individual therapy, group counseling, and telehealth options to reach a broader population within the jail (Steadman et al., 2009). Coordinating with mental health service providers ensures individuals can continue their treatment after release.
Case Management and Reentry Planning
One key to successful reentry from local jails is providing individualized case management. Case managers or social workers assess each individual’s needs and create a release plan that addresses factors like housing, employment, health care, and continued substance abuse or mental health treatment (Petersilia, 2003). By connecting individuals to community resources before release, case managers help bridge the gap between incarceration and independent living.
Some jails are also using reentry coordinators who maintain connections with community organizations, employers, and social service agencies. This allows reentry staff to arrange stable housing, job interviews, or family reunification plans in advance, helping individuals avoid homelessness, unemployment, and other challenges that can lead to recidivism (McKean & Ransford, 2004).
Transitional Programs and Community Partnerships
Building partnerships with community organizations is essential for effective reentry. Local nonprofits, faith-based organizations, and governmental agencies provide critical support in housing, employment, counseling, and mentorship (James, 2015). Programs like “day reporting centers” allow individuals to access services like drug testing, counseling, and job search assistance without being re-incarcerated. Similarly, partnerships with workforce development agencies help formerly incarcerated individuals find stable employment, which is one of the most powerful factors in reducing recidivism (Morenoff & Harding, 2014).
For example, some jails collaborate with transitional housing programs to provide temporary shelter upon release, giving individuals a stable base as they look for work and reestablish themselves in the community. Transitional housing can also be tailored to individuals facing specific challenges, such as addiction recovery or mental health needs (Visher & Travis, 2003).
Challenges and the Path Forward
Despite progress, local jail reentry programs still face obstacles, including funding limitations, staffing shortages, and inconsistent support across jurisdictions. The high demand for mental health and addiction treatment often exceeds the available resources, and many rural jails struggle to find community partners due to limited local services (Pew Charitable Trusts, 2018).
Continued advocacy for funding, community awareness, and policy reform is crucial to expanding these programs. Success also requires a cultural shift in how we view jails—not just as facilities for detention but as environments where individuals can begin a journey toward a productive life. Investing in rehabilitation and reentry programs has long-term benefits, not only for formerly incarcerated individuals but also for public safety and community well-being (Pew Center on the States, 2011).
Conclusion
Rehabilitation and reentry programs in local jails are essential tools for reducing recidivism and supporting individuals as they transition back into society. While challenges remain, innovative programs and partnerships offer hope for meaningful change. By providing education, mental health support, substance abuse treatment, and transitional resources, local jails can play a crucial role in setting individuals on a path to success. These programs, in turn, strengthen communities, reduce crime rates, and reflect a justice system invested in second chances and lasting reintegration.
____________________________
Mané Martirosyan, MSSW, CSW is an Executive Administrator at Louisville Metro Department of Corrections with a Master of Science Degree in Social Work. With experience in criminal justice and rehabilitation program development, she specializes in reentry strategies and community reintegration for formerly incarcerated individuals. She is currently serving on AJA’s Board of Directors. Mané is also a part time faculty with University of Louisville with a focus on Forensic Social Work. She can be contacted at mane.martirosyan@louivsilleky.gov
References
Bales, W. D., & Piquero, A. R. (2012). Assessing the impact of imprisonment on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(1), 71-101.
Bronson, J., & Berzofsky, M. (2017). Indicators of mental health problems reported by prisoners and jail inmates, 2011-2012. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2013). Reentry Matters: Strategies and Successes of Second Chance Act Grantees Across the United States.
Davis, L. M., Bozick, R., Steele, J. L., Saunders, J., & Miles, J. N. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education: A meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. RAND Corporation.
James, N. (2015). Offender reentry: Correctional statistics, reintegration into the community, and recidivism. Congressional Research Service.
James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Matusow, H., Dickman, S. L., Rich, J. D., Fong, C., Dumont, D. M., Hardin, C., … & Rosenblum, A. (2013). Medication-assisted treatment in US jails and prisons: Lessons learned. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(5), 506-512.
McKean, L., & Ransford, C. (2004). Current strategies for reducing recidivism. Center for Impact Research.
Morenoff, J. D., & Harding, D. J. (2014). Incarceration, prisoner reentry, and communities. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 411-429.
Pew Charitable Trusts. (2018). Prison health care: Costs and quality.
Pew Center on the States. (2011). State of recidivism: The revolving door of America’s prisons.
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
Steadman, H. J., Osher, F. C., Robbins, P. C., Case, B., & Samuels, S. (2009). Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services, 60(6), 761-765.
Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 89-113.