Unlocking Medicaid's Potential for Reentry and Correctional Conditions
David Ryan and Marc Stern, MD, MPH
The status quo is costly, ineffective, and harmful. For decades, local jails have served as a costly alternative to community-based treatment, a purpose jails were not designed for or intended to serve. This status quo has strained correctional staff who must address the complex, chronic health and behavioral health needs of the individuals in their care, custody, and control. Corrections professionals are reminded of this challenge every day at the front door of the jail as individuals with unaddressed health issues continue to cycle through. And those awaiting trial are often the sickest and most in need of care.
Individuals entering jail are sometimes coming into custody directly off the street, and at times in the throes of withdrawing from a substance. People in jails have a high level of acute health needs (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2016; Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2017; Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2017), including:
- High blood pressure—26.3% of people in jail
- Hepatitis—6.5% of people in jail
- Mental health conditions—26.4% of people in jail
- Substance use disorder—63% of people in jail
Front line staff often find themselves taking on the duties of clinicians or social workers. Corrections professionals have few supports for these duties, which has a negative impact on the wellness of the workforce as well as recruitment and retention. More often than not, this system fails correctional staff, the individuals in custody, and our communities. Promoting the health needs of individuals during the carceral period, coupled with providing a bridge to services in the community, will not only benefit those receiving the care but enhance the safety and security of staff and facilities as well.
Historically, one barrier to creating greater continuity of care between corrections and community has been the lack of access to Medicaid behind the wall. Many people in the justice system are eligible for Medicaid, especially in the 41 states that have expanded Medicaid coverage to low-income adults. Since 1965, a federal law known as the Medicaid Inmate Exclusion Policy has barred Medicaid from covering services when individuals are in custody, even if they are enrolled in Medicaid. This challenges effective reentry service provision and leaves state and local governments to shoulder the financial burden of providing care. Active Medicaid coverage upon reentry coupled with greater care coordination between corrections and community settings holds potential to improve both health and safety outcomes.
Without access to Medicaid at reentry, local jails struggle to set follow-up appointments for individuals being released because community-based healthcare providers are reluctant to book appointments for patients who lack insurance coverage. Oftentimes, this results in people returning home without access to health care or medication, a situation that is perilous for many and tragic for some. Insurance coverage and a warm handoff to services in the community at reentry is critical because research shows:
- People are 12 times more likely to die in the 2 weeks following release than the general population (Bingswanger, 2007; Mallik-Kane & Visher, 2007).
- Overdose death rates are 40—129 times higher in the 2 weeks after release than the general population (Bingswanger, 2007; Ranapurwala, 2018).
- People who have been incarcerated are nearly 10 times more likely to be homeless upon release than people who have not (Augustine & Kushel, 2022).
- Suicide risk is 2 times higher than the general population for the 3 years after release, with the highest risk time being the 2 weeks post release (Fitch et al., 2024).
Policy Changes to Drive Improved Health Outcomes & Enhance Public Safety
Research also suggests that access to insurance coverage and a connection to care in the community upon reentry can reduce future law enforcement interactions. Reducing recidivism and keeping individuals healthy also has the potential to decrease the over utilization of costly care settings like jails and emergency departments. The more individuals with acute health needs receiving care in the community, the greater the possibility there is to improve the climate of congregate settings for correctional staff and the individuals in custody. Unfortunately, to date we have failed to create a system for continuity of care across corrections and community.
Due to new changes in public policy that are taking place now, we are seeing for the first time opportunities to expand access to Medicaid in our jails to support a continuum of care. These new policy changes are taking place through changes in federal law that apply to all states and, in a growing number of states, state-specific Medicaid 1115 demonstration waivers. As of the date this article was submitted, there were four states that have received federal approval to provide targeted Medicaid covered pre-release services behind the wall for people who are about to return to communities—California, Washington, Montana, and Massachusetts. There are another nineteen pending proposals before the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the federal agency that oversees Medicaid.
New changes in federal law include a requirement, effective January 2025, to provide certain diagnostic screening and case management services to sentenced juveniles. This includes the population of youth ages 18—21. States are also given the option to provide services to the pre-adjudicated juvenile population. A year later, a new requirement that correctional facilities suspend rather than terminate Medicaid benefits during the carceral period goes into effect.
In April 2023, CMS released guidance to the field outlining the parameters and some of the requirements for states interested in applying for the 1115 demonstration waiver opportunity. In addition to allowing Medicaid to cover some services for up to 90-days before release, CMS expects states to provide case management, medication-assisted treatment, and a 30-day supply of medication upon release. The guidance also requires that states conduct a readiness assessment of carceral facilities and submit an implementation plan for CMS approval prior to launching services. In order to support these efforts, Congress authorized $113.5 million in the Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) of 2024 for planning grants to states to promote continuity of care post-release. Through these policies, corrections has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to enhance public safety, improve health outcomes, and promote cost avoidance. By strengthening the resources needed to deliver healthcare to those most vulnerable individuals, we can ease the burden placed on our local jails, and improve working conditions for correctional officers.
Meeting the Moment
This is a public safety issue and jail administrators must be at the table for discussions with state Medicaid partners regarding the implementation of these new changes, for them to be successful, the most pressing of which are the requirements to provide Medicaid-covered services to sentenced juveniles. The need to implement these provisions is an immediate and pressing priority. Health care and correctional officials must work closely together to navigate complex implementation challenges such as building systems that share information, meeting a community standard of care, and mapping out changes in workflow. In particular, the insight from practitioners with experience working with the pretrial population will be critical to tackling the complexity of developing reentry plans for individuals who have short stays and unpredictable release dates while awaiting trial. The expertise of correctional leaders, command staff, and front-line officers will be essential to lift up key operational and security concerns in order to identify potential pain points.
To that end, the call to action for our corrections professionals is two-fold:
- First, reach out to your state office of Medicaid to inquire about the status of discussions regarding the implementation of the new federal law requiring Medicaid covered services for incarcerated juveniles ages 18—21. Also, facilities could begin to review census data for this cohort, identify Medicaid enrollment practices, and understand the screening & assessment tools used for medical, behavioral health, etc.
- Second, ask whether your state has submitted an 1115 demonstration waiver, and if so begin discussions regarding the implementation of the proposed changes.
Acting on these unprecedented opportunities now can save lives, improve safety, and make the jobs of local law enforcement and correctional staff easier. We’re optimistic that Medicaid coverage and connections to care upon reentry will improve health outcomes and enhance public safety by returning individuals back home healthy and whole. Jails have a critical role to play in seizing the potential but the work must begin today.
________________________________
David Ryan is Senior Director of Criminal Justice Initiatives at the Health and Reentry Project (HARP). David has over fifteen years of experience working on policy issues at the intersection of health and justice. Prior to joining HARP, David spent over a decade at the Middlesex Sheriff’s Office leading policy priorities to advance changes to the Medicaid Inmate Exclusion Policy (MIEP). He also spent five years working as a legislative aide in the U.S. Senate. For more information, he can be contacted at DRyan@HealthandReentryProject.org.
Dr. Marc Stern, MD, MPH is a general internist and former Assistant Secretary for Health Care at the Washington Department of Corrections. He is currently Affiliate Assistant Professor University of Washington School of Public Health in Seattle, Washington. Dr. Stern also serves as Medical Advisor on the AJA Board of Directors. For more information, he can be contacted at marcstern@live.com.
References
Augustine, D., & Kushel, M. (2022). Community Supervision, Housing Insecurity, & Homelessness. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 701(1), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221113983
Binswanger, I., et al. (2007). Release from prison—a high risk of death for former inmates. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(2), 157-165. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa064115
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2016). Medical problems of state and federal prisoners and jail inmates, 2011-12. Retrieved from https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/mpsfpji1112.pdf
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2017). Indicators of Mental Health Problems Reported by Jail and Prison Inmates, 2011-12. Retrieved from https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/imhprpji1112.pdf
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2017). Drug Use, Dependence and Abuse Among State Prisoners and Jail Inmates, 2007-2009. Retrieved from https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/dudaspji0709_sum.pdf
Fitch, K. V. et al. (2024). Suicide Mortality Among Formerly Incarcerated People Compared with the General Population in North Carolina, 2000-2020. American Journal of Epidemiology, 193(3), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad214
Mallik-Kane, K. & Visher, C. (2007). Health and Prisoner Reentry: How Physical, Mental, and Substance Abuse Conditions Shape the Process of Reintegration. Urban Institute. Retrieved from” https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/31491/411617-Health-and-Prisoner-Reentry.PDF
Ranapurwala et al. (2018), Opioid Overdose Mortality Among Former North Carolina Inmates: 2000-20. American Journal of Public Health, 108(9), 1207–1213. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304514?journalCode=ajph