Screening in Correctional Facilities:
Exploring the Latest Protocols for Contraband Detction
Will Plummer
The corrections industry has long been inundated with contraband smuggling, including drugs, electronics, phones, money, and more. Many news stories highlight the use of drones, postal mail, and other methods to get contraband into jails and prisons. There has been plenty of recent news of contraband making its way into the general population through intake areas, which are areas designated for security screening, booking, or registration.
Just recently, an apparent attempt1 at drug smuggling in court delayed proceedings in the “Young Thug” trial. Lawyers have been arrested2 for smuggling drugs to clients, and a Nevada corrections officer3 had to go to the hospital after a potential exposure to fentanyl during a cell search. In short, contraband is present in every part of the correctional facility.
The problem is, there is no singular, simple way and effective solution to detect drugs or contraband inside of mail, or a cell, or on an incarcerated person. Current manual screening processes run the risk of staff exposure to dangerous substances and a pat down or X-ray may not reveal a small SIM card or a small amount of powder. This is what you should know about the risk that contraband poses for staff and what steps correctional facilities can take to improve their contraband detection processes.
What Makes Detecting Contraband Difficult?
While every correction facility has unique challenges when it comes to contraband detection there are several that are common across the board—lack of resources, over-population, emerging substances, limited technology, and legal mail privacy challenges. Nearly every correctional facility is understaffed4 and underfunded,5 which makes it difficult for them to adequately screen and prevent contraband from entering the facility. This can impact the implementation and maintenance of comprehensive contraband interdiction measures like the use of advanced technologies and regular staff training.
The second challenge is overcrowding6 in jails and prisons. While there are new legislative endeavors seeking to address that problem, prisons and jails are too full, especially compared to the number of staff. This makes it more difficult to monitor and control an individual’s activities effectively and provides more opportunities for contraband to enter the facility. It also makes it harder to screen the large volume of incoming personal and legal mail.
The third challenge is that malicious actors are using more innovative methods to get contraband into correctional facilities. Synthetic drug compounds are constantly changing, and there has been a shift toward using legal substances as intoxicants, such as household cleaners and other common chemicals. These substances render drug identification kits less effective, and drug sniffing canine units can’t train fast enough to detect contraband efficiently. Electronics are getting smaller and easier to hide every year. Intake areas continue to be a top place where contraband is being introduced, but whereas individuals used to be able to carry contraband in with them on their person, body scanners and increased security are making that more difficult. As an alternative, malicious actors can take advantage of legal documents and court paperwork as a means to smuggle contraband into courts and facilities, making it increasingly difficult for staff to keep up with the latest threats.
Then there’s the limitations of screening technology. X-ray scanners are common in prison mailrooms but not well-suited to today’s contraband which is too small, or in a format that X-rays can’t pick up on. For instance,
these scanners can’t detect small amounts of liquids and powders or drug-treated paper, which constitute the majority of contraband in jails and prisons. Manual screening, or physical inspection, is an alternative that can result in staff getting exposed to hazardous substances as it typically requires the screener to open letters and packages.
What may be the most challenging problem, due to the restrictions placed on screening staff, centers on screening an incarcerated person’s legal mail. Legal mail is broadly categorized as correspondence originating from legal representation or the court system. These documents are constitutionally protected to maintain privacy and confidentiality. This limits how this type of mail can be screened, and thus creates a loophole that is increasingly easy for bad actors to exploit: concealing contraband in fraudulent legal mail. Many prisons and jails have considered simply digitizing mail and destroying the originals. But that requires opening the mail to scan it into a digital system, raising the risk that the screener could read the mail, or the stored file could be compromised in the event of a cyber-attack, or be inappropriately accessed or misused. Add to that, whoever opens and scans the mail is at risk of exposure to any dangerous substances contained within. This means that digitization is not a viable solution to preserve privacy, confidentiality, and safety in the screening process for legal mail.
Risks For Staff and Incarcerated Persons
All those challenges lead to a serious concern: corrections officers and persons under their care alike are getting hurt. Much of the contraband that gets smuggled into jails and prisons consists of dangerous drugs like fentanyl. Just one example is a New York City corrections officer that was exposed to fentanyl7 while sorting mail. She required a Narcan dose and hospitalization. In Nevada, a correctional officer got exposed8to an unknown substance while searching a prison cell, resulting in hospitalization. However new synthetic opioids like Isotonitazine9(ISO), and legal non-opioid drugs like the tranquilizer, xylazine,10are even more potent11 than fentanyl and have the potential of doing real harm.
In addition to accidental exposure, there’s the risk of increased violence due to contraband smuggling. Some contraband is weaponized to commit crimes against other inmates or staff members. For example, in Tennessee,12a corrections officer was searching an incarcerated person’s clothing in the course of being transferred to another area. The corrections officer discovered drugs, leading to an altercation and resulting in the officer being assaulted and fentanyl being blown in her face. The officer had to go to the hospital for treatment. In May, five officers got injured13 while trying to subdue a violent inmate who was under the influence of drugs.
And finally, there is the sad reality of overdoses as an ongoing and increasing problem in prisons and jails. Overdoses in state prisons due to drugs and alcohol have increased by 600 percent14 between 2001 and 2018. It’s all too easy to find specific examples. In 2022, a body scan failed to detect fentanyl15 that an incarcerated individual had on his person. That incident resulted in three overdoses. More recently, just one incident16 of fentanyl smuggling last month resulted in seven overdoses at a single jail. And the problem is getting worse.
Enhancing Safety
Thankfully, there are new technologies and protocols available to aid contraband detection and keep officers safe during cell searches and mail screening.
With regards to technology, many correctional facilities today are turning to T-ray scanners instead of legacy X-ray technology. Unlike X-ray, a T-ray scanner doesn’t use unsafe radiation, and it is much smaller than an X-ray scanner, which means it is also more mobile and requires less training. T-ray scanning allows screeners to see through letters and packages without opening them to detect contraband in live 3D video.
T-ray imaging can easily detect all types of drugs and contraband that corrections facilities are facing, including drug-treated paper, liquids, powders, weapons, electronics and more. Since these scanners are portable, they can be deployed across multiple facilities with ease, and the scanners are versatile, so they can be used in intake areas and cell searches for soft object screening of personal items like clothes, pillows, and toiletries. The operators can quickly and safely detect and quarantine any potential contraband.
In the future, AI approaches can be applied to enhance imaging solutions, like T-ray, to automatically recognize and alert personnel to potential contraband so they can confirm and quarantine suspect items. These types of technologies will help prisons and jails even further reduce the amount of contraband while also preserving privacy for inmates and safety for staff and compensating for understaffing.
In terms of protocols, it’s important to consider the five parts of a comprehensive mail security operation: people, procedures, education, screening tools, and response plans. For people, you need to analyze your current internal screening staff and find out if there are any gaps or risks. What do your facilities and staff lack that could help them improve? Do you have in-house experts available who have the longstanding smuggling and contraband expertise to recognize substances and help you improve your processes? If not, are there external support resources that you can leverage to fill in those gaps?
Next, examine your procedure and determine the following: Do you have a standardized process for mail screening across all sites and facilities? Does your staff know how to safely handle potentially harmful drugs or toxic substances and simplify your existing procedures? What must occur to ensure adherence to legal mail screening and managing chain of custody if contraband is detected? These are just a few items to plan for. Rather than simply adding to existing procedures, you can use technology and training to improve efficiency and remove unnecessary or manual steps. Standardization and simplification of these processes across all your locations and facilities will help you decrease costs, increase efficiency, and reduce human error.
Third, do you have a training plan to keep your screening staff and officers prepared for the ever-changing trends in contraband detection and smuggling? And are you continually reinforcing and updating those standard operating procedures and retraining new staff during high turnover periods? A solid training platform will include the use of mobile apps, eBooks, webinars, and more to keep staff informed.
Next, you need the right tools in place that are affordable, easy to use, and quick to deploy. You should be able to put these tools to use throughout your facilities in mailrooms, intake areas, cells, and wherever else you might need to screen for contraband. Those tools should also be easy to scale, like remote monitoring tools, T-ray scanners, and so on. They should support your standard operating procedures and be versatile enough to adjust to the needs of different locations and to assist in detecting emerging contraband and substances.
Last, you need the right response plans in place. Tailor your response plans to the individual risks and needs of your facility and focus on restoring normal operations and minimizing disruption in the event of an emergency. That will involve determining ahead of time how you will quarantine, report and audit potential drugs or contraband items, engage with law enforcement peers, contact relevant emergency personnel, and report and dispose of contraband. You also need to have evacuation and emergency care plans in place in case of accidental exposure or area contamination. In other words, plan for the worst-case scenario.
Facilities that implement these strategies, policies, technologies, and external expertise are having more success than ever before at eliminating accidental exposure for staff, simplifying and speeding up the screening process, and reducing contraband that gets past screening or causes inmate overdoses.
Looking At the Future
Corrections facilities can lead the industry in safety and efficiency simply by implementing enhanced screening technology like T-ray scanners and developing best-practice procedures and protocols. Staying abreast of new screening techniques and opening lines of communication amongst other facilities will assist in faster and more streamlined screening and insight into new contraband on the horizon. Looking even further out, the potential of efficiencies and improved contraband detection offered by AI coupled with advanced imaging technology will make corrections staff jobs easier and safer and meet new screening requirements.
Correction leaders must be vigilant, be aware of emerging contraband incidents to continually improve the lives and safety of staff and people under their care.
_________________________________
Will Plummer is a 25-year veteran of the US Army, where he earned a Bronze Star with Valor as a Master Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Technician, and commanded multiple Special Operations units with multiple combat deployments. He has an MA from the Naval War College and a BA from the University of California at Chico. Currently, Will is the Chief Security Officer for next-generation mail screening technology provider RaySecur. He leads the company’s physical security efforts, overseeing a team of EOD professionals, and managing clients’ threat mitigation efforts. For more information, he can be contacted at will@raysecur.com
References
1. Zaru, D. (2023c, January 25). Jury selection in Young Thug trial interrupted amid allegations of drug smuggling in court. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/US/jury-selection-young-thug-trial-interrupted-amid-allegations/story?id=96634016
2. Holliday, AJ. (2022, August 9). Birmingham-area attorney charged with smuggling drugs into jail for client. CSB42. https://www.cbs42.com/news/crime/birmingham-area-attorney-charged-with-smuggling-drugs-into-jail-for-client/
3. Murphy, V. (2023, January 6). Nevada corrections officer exposed to possible fentanyl, department confirms. 8 News Now. https://www.8newsnow.com/investigators/nevada-corrections-officer-exposed-to-possible-fentanyl-department-confirms/
4. LeMasters, K., Maner, M., Peterson, M., Brinkley-Rubinstein, L. (2022, January 21). Staff Shortages in Prisons and Jails Highlight Opportunities for Decarceration. Health Affairs. https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/staff-shortages-prisons-and-jails-highlight-opportunities-decarceration
5. Arévalo, D. (2022, August 22). Jail overcrowding to cause budget shortfall for Texas county in coming year.Corrections1. https://www.corrections1.com/finance-and-budgets/articles/jail-overcrowding-to-cause-budget-shortfall-for-texas-county-in-coming-year-hubLCVnJ9E5SxJZD/
6. Blakinger, K. (2022, November 4). Why So Many Jails Are in a ‘State of Complete Meltdown.’ The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2022/11/04/why-so-many-jails-are-in-a-state-of-complete-meltdown
7. Krauth, D. (2023, January). Bronx jail officer hospitalized after exposed to fentanyl in mail. ABC 7. https://abc7ny.com/7-on-your-side-investigates-nyc-correction-officer-fentanyl-jail/12728398/
8. Murphy, V. (2023, January 6). Nevada corrections officer exposed to possible fentanyl, department confirms. 8 News Now. https://www.8newsnow.com/investigators/nevada-corrections-officer-exposed-to-possible-fentanyl-department-confirms/
9. Garcia, N. (2023, February 10). New Opioid 10 times stronger than fentanyl hitting the streets of California. ABC30 News. https://abc30.com/new-opioid-fentanyl-danger-drugs-in-california-narcan/12794507/
10. Xylazine | National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2023, June 13). National Institute on Drug Abuse. https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/xylazine
11. Garcia, N. (2023, February 10). ABC30 Fresno. New opioid 10 times stronger than fentanyl hitting the streets of California. https://abc30.com/new-opioid-fentanyl-danger-drugs-in-california-narcan/12794507/
12. Garcia, T. (2023, March 26). Franklin County corrections officer exposed to fentanyl during inmate altercation. WSMV4. https://www.wsmv.com/2023/03/26/franklin-county-corrections-officer-exposed-fentanyl-during-inmate-altercation/
13. Aka. (2023, June 7). WYOMING COUNTY/Multiple officers injured at Wyoming Correctional Facility. Video News Service. https://videonewsservice.net/index.php/2023/06/06/wyoming-county-multiple-officers-injured-at-wyoming-correctional-facility/
14. Schwartzapfel, B. (2021, July 15). Overdose Deaths In State Prisons Have Jumped Dramatically Since 2001. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2021/07/15/1015447281/overdose-deaths-state-prisons-increase
15. Mackley, C. (2023, June 1). Who’s Responsible for Jail Inmate Overdose Death? Scioto County Daily News. https://www.sciotocountydailynews.com/whos-responsible-for-jail-inmate-overdose-death/
16. KIRO 7 News Staff. (2023, May 18). Sheriff: Inmate brought in fentanyl that led to seven overdoses at Snohomish County Jail. KIRO 7 News Seattle. https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/deputies-investigating-after-7-inmates-snohomish-county-jail-taken-hospital/XGX3XXSECJENRBG2RJSH4JU65I/